Jump to content
JesusWalk Bible Study Forum

Q2. Extreme Symbolism


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

I fear that much of our Christian worship is easily made flippant these days. We dress casually (I'm ok with that) and we laugh a lot (I'm fine with that too); we often make a lot of announcements in our service (necessary, I acknowledge), but all these things have changed the way we approach worship. If we think of the bread as 'just bread' and the cup as 'just juice' or 'just wine' then there is a decided danger of taking it too casually.

The manner in which that particular part of the service is conducted plays an enormous part in how we approach communion. Perhaps it has less to do with the symbolic interpretation of the elements themselves and more to do with the solemnity of the person/people leading in worship at that point. If the person leading guides the people to focus on Christ and to express thanks for His atoning work, then there will not be a casual attitude to the Lord's Supper. "This do in REMEMBRANCE..." must be first and foremost in our participation of the Lord's Table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Becoming extreme in either direction can easily cause us to become overly dogmatic and judgmental or dangerously casual and anemic. Since the example of Christ is neither, we really need to beware. As to the specific question of adopting an extreme symbolic interpretation, this could definitely cause a careless attitude toward the purpose and use of the elements of the Lord's Supper. I agree that anything specifically instituted by Christ Himself is sacred and must be treated with utmost respect, even when we cannot fully understand. That's just an exercise in faith!

I think the balance in disagreement about specifics can only be gained by focusing not so much on the practice, but on the Provider. Christ has provided the only sacrifice that could save us from sin. He has provided redemption and restoration to the Father. He has provided our holiness to make us acceptable to God. He has provided the only way to gain eternal life in heaven. And He has provided the Spirit to live within and guide our journey there. The celebration of His Supper of remembrance is a holy, reverent thing. Our motive and desire should be to do this in remembrance of Him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is danger because there are some who do not truly understand the meaning of the Lord's Supper. The parables that are said are not to be taken literally. Each parable has a spiritual meaning, not morbid. We should hold the rememberance of Jesus Christ close to are hearts and truly understand what the Lord's Supper or as some would call The Last Supper truly means.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is not right to take the elements of the Holy Communion as mere bread and blood. The fact that they symbolise the body and blood of Jesus is one reason why every Christian should approach the 'table' and each element on the table with reverence. Any thing less demean our Lord.

God bless you all.

haar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

Any time we take things to the extreme and put too much importance on things of God rather than placing all importance on God we face trouble. Evidence of this is found in Acts 19:13 A team of Jews who were traveling from town to town casting out evil spirits tried to use the name of the Lord Jesus. The incantation they used was this: "I command you by Jesus, whom Paul preaches, to come out!" 14 Seven sons of Sceva, a leading priest, were doing this. 15 But when they tried it on a man possessed by an evil spirit, the spirit replied, "I know Jesus, and I know Paul. But who are you?" 16 And he leaped on them and attacked them with such violence that they fled from the house, naked and badly injured. And the LORD cautions us through John in Rev. 2 Look how far you have fallen from your first love! Turn back to me again and work as you did at first. If you don't, I will come and remove your lampstand from its place among the churches.

It is not about bread and wine as it was not about the handkerchiefs or cloths in Acts 19, it is about remembering Christ Jesus and loving Him because he first loved us.

I don't think anyone who believes in a purely symbolic interpretation of the Lord's Supper and remembers the crucifiction and resurection can lose any respect for our Savior. I just don't see how that is possible.

Darrell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q2. How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

The entire church experience I feel has become to casual and carefree. We do not approach God with reverence as He requires. God is the most powerful God and teh most loving God, but that does not allow us to stroll casually into His presence. Our service has very little worship involved in it and very less and less Scripture and true praise and worship. Communion can then become casual as well, and the seriousness of incorrect worship - as in Nadab and ABihu's incorrect sacrifice and as believers partaking of communion in an incorrect matter show that God is serious about how to approach Him.

There is balance but God must be the center of focus of everything we do, and we should do so in respect and reverence that He has always required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

Though the bread and the wine are symbolic, I believe they are so much more--if not why were these warnings issued concerning them?

24And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me.

25After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, this cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me.

26For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come.

27Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

28But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

29For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

30For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. 1Cor.11

These warnings tell me that to partake 'lightly' or only symbolically would be a grave mistake. The balance, in my opinion, is in the phrase; "... not discerning the Lord's body"

To discern is to "know"--to have an understanding of both the body and blood of Christ through His sacrifice.

Though I don't believe there is an actual transformation of the bread and wine into the body and blood in taking the Lords supper, I do believe in a spiritual sense, we are to see them this way as we partake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q2. How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

The traditions we follow in our churches today demonstrates so little reverence to the Lord. We go to church and hope that the time passes so we can leave. We don't really give focus to the real reason that we attend church in the beginning. We are there to worship God, to give thanks, to receive the Lord's Supper, to fellowship with other Christians, to study the word and to welcome in those that want to be saved.

There are those that wait until there is a crisis before they actually acknowledge our true reason for being there. We should hold everything that comes from "The Word" as sacred and we should respect it and pay homage to it the way we are intended to do. I guess that is why there will be an attack on the churches.

The balance is in the "power" in healing, comforting, and challenging presence and working of Jesus Christ the Lord through the Holy Spirit.

But if the church does not teach this then how can one know what the importance is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The balance comes to those who take it figuaratively simply when they reflect on Jesus & the actual act of his sacrifice for us. Keep in mind those descriptions which tell of how Jesus suffered for us. Maybe relecting back on the movie "The Passion." It's where our heart & mind are & God knows this--our spirit in touch with His. Even those who take it literally have to do this same reflecting prior to & during communion. Otherwise, it becomes just a snack....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its therefore of utmost and absolute importance to let the Holy Spirit guide us in what we say, in our thoughts and what we confess as to what our thoughts are.

Pray that such discussions do not become a means of academic debates but a spirit led forum for us to encourage each other to understand the love of God for mankind.

Thank you Holy Spirit.

In Jesus name, help us, counsel us and comfort us.

Amen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it all comes down to the teaching of the Lord's Table.

I have been to some churches where it seems to full on party mode and when it comes to communion they stop for a minute or two, take the elements and then go back to party mode.

The church today, (some) I beleive has lost the reverence for God and don't preach/teach about the power of the cross.

Not just once a year at Easter, but every day we should be teaching about the wondrous gift that is given on the cross for us.

Remember what 1Corinthians 11:24-30 warns us about taking communion too flippantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q2. How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

When we make to much symbolism out of the elements they lose there meaning to us. We forget that Christ gave us the instruction to Do This In Remembrance Of Me. We must always strive to keep Christ first place in all our worship because He was made head of the church but this is most important when taking part in communion or Lord's Supper.

The balance comes when we always put Christ first and remember why He instituted this Holy Scrament. He gave us the symbols that we were to us them to remember what He chose to do that our sins could be forgiven not just making an extra step in our church time. We need to think first of Jesus and then we can give proper place to the bread and wine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that extreme symbolism could cause us not to have a deep enough appreciation for what the elements truly stand for. As to where the balance is, perhaps a part of maintaining a better balance, could or should start in my personal preparation for receiving the elements. The way I prepare my heart and soul before I ever enter into this time of worship with Him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think there is anything else to add to the fine thoughts already stated here! In an effort to become 'more appealing' to the masses and grow churches, I'm afraid many churches may have watered down the message... As I mentioned in my last post - for me the Lord's Supper is an intimate time of reflection, confession, repentance, and conversation with our Creator; deeply personal and profound. Thank you all for your thoughts - what wonderful brothers and sisters I have!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a true believer of the Lord Jesus Christ we should take the Lord's supper more serious since it was Command which we have to follow.

The most important thing is one to live a Holy life by daily repentance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Symbolism is defined as, "the symbolic meaning or meanings of a thing or event." (Wordsmyth Dictionary)

Jesus told us to, "Do this in remembrance of me." When I come to the time when I can participate in the Lord's Supper I am reminded of all He did. I am also reminded of all He endured. His body broken, His blood spilled, His death and ressurrection. That remembrance keeps me focused on the now, who I am through Him and what He made possible.

If we focus on what this symbolic act represents and not the symbols themselves I believe we act as Jesus purposed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if we just focus on "symbolism " then we focus on the "outward" or the "ritual". That takes away from the "inward" renewal and can take the reverance out of the ceremony. It can also become so common place it becomes mundane. We are creatures of habit....and that's not good! Communion should never become something "symbolic" performed because " That's just what we do." We can't focus on what we use in it such as cups or wine or grape juice or what kinds of bread and make doctrines out of it. Communion should always be taken with emphasis on Jesus and what that means to us and for us and how we are to share with others in it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my street ministry, we regularly hold the Lord's Supper, often I perform it nightly. Some regular Church goers have a lot of difficulty when I tell them that sometimes it is held using garlic bread and coffee as the elements. Let me assure all of you who are similarly doubtful, none of the regular participants treat this sacrament with flippancy, those newer to the faith have the purpose of this sacrament explained to them either by myself or one of the many street folk who have taken on leadership of the Bible studies. At times I do have the 'correct' bread and 'juice' (many participants including myself are ex-alcoholics, so wine is not an option). The thing is, when too much emphasis is placed on the elements and not enough understanding given to the origins and purpose of the Lord's Supper, more harm is done than if we were not to practice communion merely because we don't have the 'proper' requirements.

Once at my Church an experiment was held where the bread was passed around small groups of people and each broke off a piece, followed by the 'wine' being distributed in much the same way, and many were horrified that the Lord's Supper wasn't done 'properly'. Even the position of the table that held the elements was criticised, apparently the correct place was to the left of the altar. I acknowledge that traditions are important to some, as are rituals, but more important is the reason that the Lord's Supper is celebrated, it need not detract or make the service 'flippant' because of the choice of elements that are available at the time. For those of us who participate in the Lord's Supper on the streets, it is a profound spiritual experience. God bless

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q2. How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

I think the key word is "extreme". We can lose the true meaning completely if we diminish that meaning by extreme symbolism. I saw one pastor drop a wafer on the floor one time to make his point that salvation does not come thru partaking of the Lord's Supper but by personal relationship with Jesus Christ. Which is true. However I think we should never lose sight of the spiritual importance of His presence in a special way when we join together and partake together to "do this remembrence of Me". I agree with one other post that said we, as humans, are too prone to forget in our daily lives...let us never forget! His presence with us now is very real but He is also our future and eternal Glory! Our very identity is in Christ Jesus!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An extreme symbolic inpretation could cause a person to fail to grasp the full signifcance of the elements ahd the Lord's Supper as a whole. It might not be any more than just what they see, the cracker and the juice or wine. It would lose so much of its meaning. The balance is to not go to eeither extreme.The craker and wine do not change,Ido not think,they are symbols but very important and meaningful symbols. They are to highly regarded,not to be taken lightly because they do represent the real person of Jesus Christ and his sacrifice! God help us to come to his table truly saved and humble.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q2. How can an extreme symbolic interpretation cause a person to have too little respect for the Lord's Supper and its elements? Where is the balance, do you think?

Extreme, is the key word here. Webster: Symbolism, representing things by means of symbols or of attibuting symbolic meaning or objects, events, or relationshps. If the act of taking of the Lord's Supper is focused on the objects, making it just a religious ceremony, one has gone to the extreme.

God would like us to take it to the extreme, in the relationship with the Son, who made it possible, and gave the believer this privilege. He said to do it often, for it will bring REMEMBRANCE, remembrance of the love God has for mankind, He sent His Son, made Him a little lower than the angels, why? to free us from the bondage of sin. When we partake, we can say, "I am free."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...