Jump to content
JesusWalk Bible Study Forum

Q3. Examples, Case Law, Hyperbole?


Recommended Posts

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

To many Jews of Jesus' day, these statements were offensive. Any Messiah who would turn the other cheek was not the military leader they wanted to lead a revolt against Rome. Since they were under Roman oppression , they wanted retalliation against their enemies, whom they hated. But Jesus suggested a new radical response to injustice: instead of demanding rights, give them up freely! According to Jesus , it is more important to give justice and mercy than to receive it. No I do not agree we would aide and abet evil. Take these example in obedience to the command of Jesus.

God's purpose behind this law was an expression of mercy. The law was given to judges and said, in effect, "Make the punishment fit the crime. " It was not a guide for personal revenge. These laws were given to limit vengeance and help the court administer punishment that was neither too strict nor too lenient. Some people , however , were using this phrase to justify their vendettes against others. People still try to excuse their acts of revenge by saying," I was just doing to him what he did to me.

When we were wronged , often our first reaction is to get even. Instead Jesus said we should do good to those who wrong us ! Our desire should not be to keep score. but to love and forgive. That is not natural- it is supernatural. Only God can give us the strength to love as He does. Instead of planning vengeance , pray for those who hurt you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These examples simply call us to live a life of Christ like love. To set selfish interest or retaliation aside and use such times as a way to minister in love to those involved. This can only happen when we willingly set self aside and allow Christ to live in and through us as He so desires. In no way would this aid and abet evil, for it is a call to live our lives on a much higher level than that of the world. It is life as Christ lived.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages

WE ARE SUPPOSE TO TURN THE OTHER CHEEK .. GO THE EXTRA MILE .... GIVE THEM OUR CLOAK AND DON'T SWITCH IT AROUND TO SUIT OUR NEEDS ..BUT WE DO IT FOR JESUS..JUST TAKE THEM THE WAY JESUS GAVE THEM

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? I offered my back to those who beat me and my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard. I did not hide my face from mockery and spitting. Give to anyone who asks; and when things are taken away from you, don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

The point is that it is better to be insulted even twice than to take the matter to court, this is what Jesus was trying to explain in His examples.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42)

What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common?

He wants us to do more than is required of us by our enemies, by those who are trying to use us, by those who are trying to take advantage of us. Rather than turn on them with resistance and retaliation we are to -- in love for them -- give them more than they require.

Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree?

This law was never intended to give an individual person the right to indulge in even the least little bit of vengeance. It was, in every case, intended to be a guide for a judge to follow in the assessment of a penalty for a crime that was committed.

How should we take these examples:

Jesus expects a different standard from us than what the world expects of us. This Sermon on the Mount is a challenge. Knowing it, you're going to have to decide who you're going to follow.

Jesus point is clear. He wants us to do more than is required of us by our enemies, by those who are trying to use us, by those who are trying to take advantage of us. Rather than turn on them with resistance and retaliation we are to -- in love for them -- give them more than they require.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The common theme is not to resist someone when he is taking from you. Resistance hardens our hearts to that person.

No, we do not aid & abet evil when this happens. We let God take the revenge on the person. We are to give willingly.

As case law--the judge decides what needs to be paid back. We must be willing to take a loss rather than have a hard heart.

As hyperbole--give more than expected or asked for.

As adages--same. Our love would show through.

This is very difficult to think about doing--I can see myself demanding MY rights, MY things, and yet I do not have any rights, really, and the things are God's!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

38 "You have heard that it was said, 'Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.' 39 But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also. 40 And if someone wants to sue you and take your tunic, let him have your cloak as well.

"Do not resist an evil person" indicates that the first person was in the wrong. "If someone sues you" indicates that the second person is in the wrong. In both cases vengence is done away with. In the first case Jesus says that you should not seek vengence in court, and in the second case he is saying offer double payment instead of going to court.

I don't think that we should take this to the extreme and put ourselves in harms way and therefore putting God to a test as Jesus also warns in chapter 4:6 "If you are the Son of God," he said, "throw yourself down. For it is written: "'He will command his angels concerning you, and they will lift you up in their hands, so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.'" 7 Jesus answered him, "It is also written: 'Do not put the Lord your God to the test.'"

I we take Jesus' words as an adage he is saying that we should not provoke a fight and that we should look to the more honorable way out.

Darrell

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

1) Each one is a higher calling to outrageous love, rather than to resist or retaliate.

2)No, Jesus would never call us to abet or aid evil. I believe that those who say this may be confusing His words with what one may be required to do in a violent or abusive situation. These cameos are speaking of insults, or use of time or matierial goods, like a cloak. He's not saying to stay in a life threatening situation if you can escape, or to go willingly with a rapist, etc.

3)As a call to do more than is required by our enemies, or by those trying to use or take advantage of us, rather than to try to get revenge, hold a grudge, or get even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

They are to teach us that we are to be more than kind to those who aren't necessarily kind to us. We are to treat even our enemies as though they are our brothers. We are to show love to all people not just those close to us. No, abetting would be allowing someone to harm another and does not apply when talking about your self. You can forgive some one who harms you can't forgive someone who harms another they alone can do that. We should take them just as the are at face value to help teach us to love our neighbor as our self.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They all show that we should go the extra mile. We don't abet evil, but people think about what was done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These cameo's alter our perception of all situations in life. The motive or reason we do anything now is not in self interest but to glorify the father. It is about our relationship with Jesus - about being salt and light about living in a new loving way where our focus is different. We are not encouraged to abet evil in any way we are encourged to seek the Father's will in all areas of our life. It is about being different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These are illustrations of love for our fellow man. These rules are not to be taken as case law because they are meant to be applied at a personal level. Chistlike love should always be our response to personal insults, slurs, or demands. We should recognize that we are as fallen as the one who is personally offending us. On the contrary to the thought that these sorts of responses would aid and abet evil, they would instead be "heaping burning coals on his head" (Proverbs 25:22; Romans 12:20)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree?

Yes! I do think if taken literally, depending on the circumstances, we would aid and abet evil. I think through the centuries, we have turned the other cheek to evil, we did not take a stand for justice, and we let evil rule. The church literally turned the other cheek when the Jews were tortured, and killed, because they did not believe Jesus was the Messiah. But, here, I believe the Lord is speaking about our spiritual growth, coming from the heart. Do not let hatred, revenge, rule our hearts, Let love rule instead.

God's teaching to us is, not to let evil rule our lives, and especially our hearts; This isn't a teaching for us to turn the cheek to injustice. We live in this world who's ruler is Satan. If taken literally, we would literally have to turn the cheek if an evil person came into our home, to do evil.

Jesus, speaking to the Pharisees who adhered to the law outwardly, is teaching the importance of following the law inwardly, from the heart, a heart set to please God Almighty. Yes, take it literally if you want to grow in the Lord, to let Him change our hearts. It is a heart operation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common?

They are all examples of giving more than required - of yourself and your posessions - giving more love to the people around you and not just your friends.

Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

There will always be people that will take advantage of these things but on the whole people would see you as being different. I don't believe Jesus is asking or telling us to let everyone walk all over us and to not stand up for ourselves. He is saying that everything we do - to do it with love not to hate the person or to react with hate. How would we treat a very close friend who hurt us? With the love and forgiveness that Jesus is talking about. We should be the same for our enemies as they are God's children too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

In common Jesus

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus often used hyperbole or exaggeration to drive home His wise sayings. When you are teaching it is often necessary in order to get people to pay attention.

The common factor in verses 39-42 is love. The Lord wants us to love our neighbor as we do ourselves, even if our neighbor happens to be our worst enemy. I don't believe He intends for us to get our tailends whooped or to give all of our possessions in order to show love as He does expect us to be able to rule with a rod of iron. The point here is that we are to do the right thing out of love. That is compassion and is the greatest way to win over your adversary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What Jesus' examples or tiny cameos have in common is the theme of non-retaliation. When our enemies try to take advantage of us, rather than turn on them with resistance and retaliation, we are to love them and pray for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These examples of Jesus show that the Kingdom of God, His heavenly Kingdom, is made up of His love that His disciples show to others, and not of the worldly self-interests; and then He gives us several examples of how we are to show this agape love towards others, whether friend or foe. If we show these examples of love to others simply with our own will-power, then they would aid and abet evil; but if they are shown to others with God’s power in and behind us, then we would be able win others over with God’s love and grace because His grace is much stronger then any evil that can be done here on the earth. We need to see and use these as examples in our lives to show others the tremendously powerful love of God that He has for us; and if then to demonstrate this love to them for the sake of His Kingdom and ultimately His rule over all of creation. Amen!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is in common in these verses is the explanation of the standard we are to live by, to love our enemies. No, I don't think we would be abetting evil, we would be resisting the temptation to lower ourselves to the enemy's standards. We are to take these examples as a standard of how to live our lives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?

These examples or tiny cameos mean that we are not the judge over anything, God is the judge over all. We are to in every situation walk away, not harden our hearts against our neighbor, family, friend, or enemy, but pray for them. We are to release them over to God and to follow his will. Living in a Christ-like Life is what we are required to do. Vengence is not ours, God is our vendicator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:angry:

Q3. (Matthew 5:39-42) What do Jesus' examples or tiny cameos in verses 39-42 have in common? Someone has said that if we were to carry out verses 39-42 literally, we would aid and abet evil. Do you agree? How should we take these examples: As case law? As hyperbole? As a series of aphorisms or adages? In another way?
So how are we to apply the laws governed by the land ??? Does this mean we are to let our enemies run all over us ???? How do you walk in love to those who have offended you ? Some offenses are more easily resolved than others. I can forgive a person who takes the life of a loved one but that does not mean I will not expose the offender to the proper authorities . I guess this question is very conflicting with the human soul. I face a situation in which someone forged the deeds to my parents home, took out a mortgage and now the house is jeopardy of foreclosure. Although I forgave the offender and tried to work something out to prevent this from happening , they continued to lie and manipulate the situation until I was forced to report their actions. This was a sibling. Am I to just let my parents home they worked so hard to pay off go to auction ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...