Travis63

How did God fulfill his promises in the Davidic Covenant? Through Jesus Christ In what ways is it fulfilled in Christ? Christ's Kingdom is everlasting

How did God discipline David and his descendants? Justly In David's case He allowed opportunities whereby David could choose to lean upon Him for His sufficiency if he choose to. David's internal wows would be harsh! However he would not be forsaken! His descendants would be perpetuate generations sins and misdeeds, many of them would follow their emotions and place self first. As they do so many would not turn unto God in a repentant state. Their discipline was emotional, mental anguish, and unfortunately some of them lost their lives. The lesson states, "the chastisement came in the form of family problems and suffering " Nevertheless the Davidic covenant would be honored by God. The descendents reign began with Solomon, as a figure, but accomplished in Christ.

What are the main promises of the Davidic Covenant? God reaffirms the promise of the land that He made in the first two covenants with Israel (the Abrahamic and Mosaic Covenants). God promises that David’s descendant or “seed” will succeed him as king of Israel and that David’s throne will be established forever. A great name Security within his territory Peace Establish his dynasty/ house where rulers come from his descendants His son to build a house for God An everlasting kingdom Are these promises conditional or unconditional? THESE promises: these promises are unconditional. The Davidic Covenant is unconditional because God does not place any conditions of obedience upon its fulfillment. The surety of the promises made rests solely on God’s faithfulness and does not depend at all on David or Israel’s obedience. Why does conditionality make a difference? Conditional makes a difference because there are things that must be done in order for the promise to be fulfilled. Conditionality mean that it is based upon something that believer must do. Most of these promises begin with the word "if." God promises to do something IF man does something. God will do His part if man does his part. For if ye forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly Father will also forgive you Matthew 6:14 Unconditional means that it's all on God, Genesis 9:8-11. God says that He will never again destroy the whole earth by means of a world-wide flood in the manner as was done Genesis 6-8. Which of these promises is most important to you as a Christian? The one that directly applies to not only myself but to those who believe that He is Lord.

Why is Nathan so quick to give David approval to build the temple? I believe Nathan doesn't disagree with David because the desire appeared to be a good thing, David's intentions were not corrupt. He perhaps knew that David had an intimate relationship with the Lord, a desire to please Him. Returning the Ark David demonstrated that he was a worshipper. He probably considered David’s love for the Lord, and in doing so he readily gave his approval. He probably had heard that David sought the counsel of the Lord on a number of occasions and was successful by doing so. The unfortunate circumstance here is that Nathan was not speaking as God's direct representative, he did not provide counsel with the Lord's approval, therefore he was in agreement of his own accord as he agreed to David's desires. What should have Nathan done instead? Sought the counsel of the Lord, at a minimum drew lots. What is the danger of leaders and followers too quickly approving major spiritual directions without really waiting upon the Lord? Not only would they be out of God's Will, the guidance they pass could cause others to be outside of God's Will. David's heart is partly right about building the temple though. Which part does David have right? Listening to the Lord through Nathan, adhering to the Will of the Lord and not forgoing his own agenda. I believe because we know how the upcoming chapters and verses read, that we can say David was partly right. At this point it was not the Lord's desire to have the temple built, He did not ask nor instruct that a temple should be built.

What has happened to Michal that she is so bitter at David? There are many possibilities, she fell out of love with him; in her mind she may have felt that David abandoned her, didn’t protect her from her father. She may have dwell on being a pawn manipulated by powerful men in her life, she was promised to David, given to another, then taken by David in a political move to legitimize his claim to the throne. She could have been She could have actually grown to love her husband of 8 or 9 years but now she’s with David against her will. It could have been that she’s not number one in David’s life and or she feels that he doesn’t love her. She could have been lonely, and now she lashed out. Her bitterness stems from somewhere, it has a root, its root in my opinion we can only speculate, the root cause simply could be that she was hurting or holding onto pain. All of the above mentioned and perhaps more could be mentioned, “She despised him in her heart”. Despise is defined as to dislike somebody or something intensely and with contempt. The Scriptures provide the manifestations not the root cause; it acknowledges that she despised him. On the surface she says David was “as one of the vain fellows shamelessly uncovereth himself!” He was as someone who didn’t know better, a commoner, someone that was not of royalty. As someone may say today you can take a person from the ghetto, but you can’t take that ghetto out of them”. The person saying this could be jealous or envious. Michal likewise could have been jealous, jealous that David received notary attention and he ignored her, he gave more attention to others and things. Perhaps he didn’t show her any loving affection, that their relationship was cold and mechanical. How does her bitterness cause her to misjudge what she sees? Because she is preoccupied with what she has placed before her eyes. Her mind is not a peace; her thoughts in this moment are not godly nor are they one God. She misjudges David’s action because she only sees through lens that are filled with what has caused her to despise him in her heart. Are you bitter towards God about something in your past? Not that I am aware of, if there is any bitterness or anything that is corrupt my prayers is that He brings it to remembrance and that I repent of / from it. What effect might it have on your spiritual life? If I were bitter towards God, or if I held something against Him, I too would be blinded by whatever it was that I was holding. This would form barriers between God and I. The barriers would prevent or cause me to be out of His Will, possibly to drift away. The drift could be for a moment, a season or the start of falling away. I perceive that Michal through life’s experiences grew more like Saul than David. If we are victims of some consequence, if someone has offended us, if we believe that God has hid His face from us, we still have the power to choose. Choose as Job did, yet will I praise Him, yet will I honor Him, yet will I obey Him, or we can be influenced by the circumstance prompt by self through many pitied thoughts. Or through the voice of someone an onlooker influenced by the evil one, or by the voice of the evil one himself. How can you find healing from the bitterness? In Him, in God (He is a Healer / Deliverer) through the process of love (Proverbs 10:12; Romans 13:10). What would have happened if David had conformed his worship expression to his wife’s preferences? At this instance he would have provided an example that would not have lift the Lord up, that would not have glorified the Lord that would not have been an example that identified him as a worshipper of God. He would have placed the opinion of man above the Will of God.

How would you describe David's approach to worship? In this instance David did so through a dance, his approach was to do so with all his might. As he danced the Bible does not record the people in his presences were watching him accessing his dance. However it does record Michal watching him, as she did the Bible records that she despised him in her heart. When don't truly know the root cause, it could have been she held a different view of how royalty should conduct themselves. It could have been that she disliked David uprooting her from her husband. It could have been that David did not show her love. It could have been a combination of many factors. After the ark was secured, after the festivities had cease, when he met Michal she through criticism voice her opinion, he retorts "And I will yet be more vile than thus, and will be base in mine own sight." David was determined to praise the Lord before people and he reaffirmed praise Him even if it meant being humiliated in his own eyes or her eyes, yet he would be honored by the maidservant that his wife mention who would look at him in a different manner because of his dance. In essence David saw it as they would honor him, that if the king will dance that this unto the Lord then it is ok, a good thing to do so. What does his dancing here teach us? I do not see it so much as his dancing but more so the principle as to why David does dance. The focus should be on the Lord, if we are saying that our praise is unto Him, not looking to please people or being greatly concerned about what they think. Not attempting to place restraints on anyone's praise be it a dance, shout, song, prayer etc, however flesh should not be a dominating factor, if a person does allow the flesh to lead and or over power the initial intent God is no longer being glorified. The individual is seeking to then glorify themselves while saying that they are praise the Lord. Additionally praise or worship is should not only be considered when we assemble, the greatest praise and or worship, in my opinion is how you live. We need to bless the Lord as we live move and have our being. We need to acknowledge that He is worthy, Worth or worship everyday in our living! What do we learn about praise from the psalms he wrote? So much we can praise Him in a song, in a shout, through clapping our hand, lifting our hands, in a dance through playing of instruments, etc.. that there is not one set way to praise the Lord, there is not a lock on doing so. Does what others might think affect your ability to worship? No! How has God been working in your life to teach you to worship him in spirit and in truth? That He is Lord, that I should exalt Him above all else. That praise, that worship is more than singing, a shout, clapping of hand, lifting of hands, dancing, playing instruments. That praise, that worship should not only occur during times when we assemble, within the four walls. That praise, that worship should occur as I live move and have my being.

How should the ark have been transported? According to the instructions the Lord had previously given! 1 Chronicles 15 How are Uzzah and David responsible if they don't know the provisions of the Mosaic Law? (responsible, accountable, liable, guilty) That's a tough one, in short David since he organized the occasion should have done the research, Uzzah sine he agreed should have done research as well. They are held accountable because He is God and His Word changes not, they had the opportunity prior to the occasion to seek His counsel. Nehemiah doesn't get a specific / direct charge to rebuild the wall however as he does he obtain guidance. Even when we take on a charge where we do not obtain a direct command from the Lord all that we do we should seek His counsel, especially if it is done with the belief that we are honoring Him. What does David's mistake in this incident teach us about seeking to do God's will? That we should make every effort to do so as we live move and have our being. When we do not do if He extends mercy and grace that we should repent and seek His counsel. As we learn His counsel and or as we become reacquainted with His counsel that we should do accordingly!

Why does God strike Uzzah? The Scriptures say that God struck him there for his irreverence, (his irreverent act, because of his error, his lack of respect), he touched the ark and he was not authorized to do so. Truthfully I believe everything else is conjecture as we try to reason within our own understanding. The speculation may be true, it can be supported / substantiated and possibly even the truth, however the Scriptures answers the question within the verse (2 Samuel 6:7.) I do not know if he was a Levite or if he wasn't a Kohathites. They were not to touch the ark, those who were authorized to carry it were to use poles and carry it upon their shoulders during transport. God warned of death if His instructions were not followed (Exodus 25:14-15; Numbers 3:30-31; 4:4-15; 7:9) regarding the holy things. I do not know Uzzah's heritage, his posterity, I don't know if he knew what was proper regarding carrying the ark. Even though Uzzah sinned in ignorance, even though his sin was rash and unintentional, I can say without a doubt that God is just. What I do know the from Scripture is that he was in error. Pastor Ralph titled this section " Transporting the Ark Man's Way" an appropriate title. When Uzzah died, David became angry, he also became afraid. The guidance that the Lord gave was disregarded, just as Uzzah had good intention so did David and those who agreed it was good to return the ark. The unfortunate factor that they adopted the transportation procedure from the Philistines (1 Samuel 6:7-8) instead of adherence to what the Lord has said. They had abandoned the formal Levitical system that was explained in the Law. They were operating according to "Man's Way" suggesting that they were a form of religion, but not the design that God had given them. Although this was tragic in eyes of David, other onlookers and perhaps even our, this tragedy rekindled a refocus and the rekindling of a necessary "fear of the Lord", not so much fear of being struck dead, but an adherence to His guidance. Why is David so angry? "because the LORD had made a breach upon Uzzah" (because the LORD had struck Uzzah so violently). Through pure conjecture I believe that he was angry because he looked upon the matter from his perspective and not from God's. He reasoned after all that Uzzah did what he could, he was being helpful, he prevented the ark from harm. I believe that he was angry because a man died as they were at peace, they were not at war, he felt his plan was good, a good thing. I believe that he was angry because this death also stopped the celebratory procession. Just as Pastor Ralph states the text does not say, I believe that we can only speculate. I can agree with the two thoughts he shared. David was confused, he felt that he was doing a good thing, the right thing. He was publicly humiliated and now his relationship with God was in question. The truth is that we can only speculate on this side of heaven.

Why does David inquire of the Lord before he attacks the Philistines the first time? Often we find he inquires of the Lord when he makes life changing decisions. He made some major decision where we don't consult the Lord, the decision to partner with the Philistine, the decision to kill Nabal etc... In both cases however God use someone (Abigail) or something (destruction at Ziklag) that ushered David's focus back to Him. This is a major decision, the Philistine had an idea of David's men fighting style, David does not use his wit alone, he inquires of the Lord to get divine guidance. What would have happened if he thought he knew how to attack the Philistines, and didn't inquire of the Lord the second time? I'm not sure, however I am glad that he did inquire of the Lord a second time. His doing so provides a teaching point for me, although God blesses us with the ability to think, to use our gifts and talents, we should still inquire of Him. David provides a great example of how to deal with stubborn enemies. He prayed, he also waited for God’s answer. When he got the answer from God, he followed God's instructions. Why do we often want to figure out the process so we can act independently, rather than wait on God as a way of life? I could sum it as a form of pride, we become confident in our learning / experience, for some of us we become interdependent. God does not want us stagnant, or as a invalid, however He desires that we are dependent upon Him. The we lean not unto our own understanding. As we love Him with our All, when we do whatever it is that we are doing (daily work, handling conflicts, communication) we are to do it in a way that we will honor Him. We do not have to quote as verse or speak in King James, New Living Translation or New International Version, nonetheless we are to be living epistles. What does that say about God? He is Supreme, Sovereign, and All Knowing, He desires those that are His seek His face, that they follow His counsel, that they honor Him. What does that say about us? We should seek the counsel of the Lord, David had experiences the supernatural, he had had successes yet he did not relay on those factors alone. He asked for guidance for the that which presently was before him as well, we should as well. The enemies tactics are not new, however he uses different tactics in hopes to facilitate the same result, doubt, distrust, distraction, disobedience. The old land marks are good, our faith should not oscillate and vacillate, nor waver, as we live move and have our being we should seek the Lords counsel.

Approximately how long has it been since David had been anointed king by Samuel? 10 - 15 years Why did the fulfillment of God's word take so long? God's timing is His timing, we can speculate, and there maybe truth to our speculation, however only God know. My take is that he was preparing David, and that David was learning. How would you evaluate David's patience concerning this prophecy that he would be king? I really do not know how to evaluate and or judge David's patience, I think because we know can read the after effect, we can speak of probable possibilities. David did seek the Lord for guidance on occasions prior to his becoming king. However we do not find one verse where he inquires when am I going to be king. Well I should rephrase, I have not found a verse where he inquire unto the Lord about his kingship. David had GREAT respect towards God appointing Saul, and the fact that Saul was anointed as well. Because he honored God, I believe that he would wait until Saul was no longer king. Being king wasn't David's ambition, he would fill the vacancy when God ushered to do so. How would you measure your own patience concerning what you believe God has promised you? There are virtually hundreds of promise in the Bible. some of the promises are conditional, and some are not. For all of the "If" when I do not comply I ask that He, God continue being patience with me. I thank Him for being True, Living, Loving and extending grace, mercy, and love towards me. I cannot say that He, God has promised me health, wealth, nor a life that I desire, if he has I wasn't as attentive as I should have been. The promise that God has promised me is that I can live abundantly. The patience I have gained through many living experiences have allowed me to be content in many situations and circumstances. My prayers are that I can through Him learn to find contentment as new circumstances and situations arise.

(2 Samuel 3:22-39) Why does Joab slay Abner? For the blood of Asahel his brother. Is he justified in doing so? No, even though they agreed to play, they were at peace, war had not been declared. Hebron was a city of refuge (Joshua 21:13 / Numbers 35:22-25), aside in the gate, I'm not sure if that is just inside the city or not, the beginning of the verse (2 Sam. 3:27) says And when Abner was returned to Hebron. In the city or just outside of it's gate, this was a public place, people passed by on a regular bases. Joab act was wicked / evil and deceiving. How does this affect his king's unification plans? The Scriptures does not give any indication of an adverse affect. I believe due to David exposing his sentiments publically the possible negative fallout didn't surface. (He renounces Joab's evil murder of Abner; he let it be known that that Abner's murder was not his nor his kingdom's desire; he orders to Joab and all those who were with him, "Tear your clothes and put on burlap. Mourn for Abner." and he himself walked behind the procession to the grave; lastly he laments (composed and sings) at the grave. Why do you think Joab is so blind? Anger, perhaps additionally with all or most of the elements that prompt a person to seek revenge. (fear, jealousy, envy ...) How can our spiritual blindness get in the way of God working out His plan in our lives? Because God does force His Will upon us, spiritual blindness prevents us from living as He desires us to live. Which can adversely affect not only our lives but others also. Nor does our spiritual blindness glorify God. When my spirit is fixed on my view and does not align with His Spirit, I am living in disobedience. Be it disobedience for that moment or for an extended period of time I am out of His Will. I was created to worship Him, when I do not He is not glorified through me, my actions, my behavior. As I attempt to glorify myself my life is tainted with disorder that has the potential to infect others. Spiritual blindness can be seen as self centeredness, I have determined to do things my way according to my will. By doing so I do not place His Will first. As I do so I endure, encounter greater hardship than I would have had to. Following my won will I also dishonor God, I can also cause others to be affected by my sin(s). Because I chose and was chosen to be His people deliberate sin(s) should be abstained from, when I am aware that I've sinned I should turn from it, from self-centeredness and back to Him, to His covering, and yield my desires to His Word and His will.

David is gracious in his memorial psalm. How does he remember Saul's life? It's not so much that David does not remember the negatives about Saul's actions, he does not attempt to persuade the people to have a different view of Saul. He decides to honor that God choose Saul, he honors Saul's position. he honors Saul's posterity, he honors Israel. He does not rejoice over Saul's death nor does he desire the people in that day or the days to come to rejoice over God's appointed / anointed. David demonstrates Christ likeness, God's desire, not reviling against those who do so unto you, although Saul is not physically there he yet treats him as he would like to be treated. A powerful, powerful testimony of how David kept his heart free from bitterness, even though he was wronged. How does 1 Chronicles 10:13-14 remember Saul's life? 2 Peter 1:20-21; 2 Timothy 3:16 The writer of 1 Chronicles had his own writing style, however he was inspired by God, he penned not of his own interpretation, nor was the prophecy (truth) origin of his own will. He records that Saul transgressed against the Lord, he did not seek the Lord, that he sought another source and the consequences of his choice / actions. How do you think God evaluates Saul's life? God evaluates Saul's life according to what He inspired the writer of 1 Chronicles 10:13-14 to write. What do we learn from this? From the perspective of David we learn that that the principles that Christ spoke in The Gospels are also demonstrated in the Old Testaments. From the writer of 1 Chronicles 10:13-14, it is affirmed that although God is LOVE He desires obedience. I agree with Pastor Ralph's lesson's for the entire lesson: "In this lesson, we've seen God's hand at work in David's life. Some lessons for disciples include: We must learn to strengthen ourselves in the Lord when our lives seem like they're falling apart. There are many examples of how to do this in David's Psalms. When we can, we should share the Lord's bounty with others, even with those who may not deserve it. We need to learn to die well so that our epitaph brings glory to the Lord, rather than disgrace."

(1 Samuel 30:6) From the Psalms of David, how does David seem to strengthen himself in the Lord when things are going bad? I believe he does so by surrendering unto God! He acknowledges God as being All wise, All knowing, All power. He glorifies God, he acknowledges God as his guide his source to move forward, and lastly if there was any iniquity he repents of it. What devotional exercises does he adopt? Worth ship, worship, praise, and prayer. What is the focus of his faith? "My soul finds rest in God alone; my salvation comes from Him. He alone is my rock and my salvation; The focus (center, heart, focal point) of his faith is God Himself!

(1 Samuel 30:1-6) Why do the men blame David? "the soul of all the people was grieved, every man for his sons and for his daughters" "all his men were very bitter about losing their sons and daughters" The reasons could have been many, the lesson points towards if they had not been away, that could have very well be a reason. I believe that the reason is the same as it has been since the beginning, emotionally they were pressed. Because they were pressed emotionally they look for some one to blame, as they looked for someone to blame cause and effect came into play, this happened because. I learned something many years ago that I earnestly try to live by, unfortunately I have failed more times than I have been successful. H.A.L.T. Never may a decision when you are hungry, angry, lonely, or tired. Translation never make an important decision when you are emotional due to pressing circumstances. Note: Many times I have heard of David at Ziglag, and often, more than often the focus is going into the enemies camp to retrieve what the devil has stolen. Many sermons and song have been written concerning. I love another facet that is not often talked about, the sovereignty of God, though the circumstances are bleak, He allowed or ordained David and the men to return when they did. The Amalekites had just left, the destruction and the emptiness was visible, the fire and the smoke was visible, however they could not move but so fast with women, children and the booty. Why is the situation so explosive at this point? At that time, in the moment of suspense there was an emotional powder keg, all kinds of emotions were amidst, sadness, confusion, disbelief, ANGER, etc, the men (thought in their hearts) "spake of stoning him" When someone is anger often it doesn't take much to set them off, a word, pointing of a finger, a look, etc.. it doesn't always require the laying of hands when rage or when someone is near rage to go off. A man not long ago attacked a women at the airport because she continued to cough, he thought that she was spreading a disease of some sort when in truth she had coughing asthma. She was brutally assaulted, he was arrested all because he reacted in anger and haste. What does David do in the situation? David upon seeing the camp in the state of destruction wept aloud until just as the men did until he had no strength left to weep. Even though the men spoke to stone him, even though they sought to place the blame upon him, David did not retort an accusation, a word of offense nor defense. David turn to his Help, he turn where the others should have. "David encouraged himself in the LORD his God." "David found strength in the LORD his God." David could not turn to the men, he turned to God, the only one that could provide what was needed. The foundations had failed, but the Foundation was still firm, David was shocked, he had lost all, everything--wives, family, possession, comrades in arms, their fidelity, their confidence, and the their trust. David hit rock bottom, and this drove him to total dependence on God. This has happened to me on many occasions, not beibg int total dependence on / of the Lord! Love this, Psalm 11, it does not speak directly to 1 Samuel 30, there is still merit, and I believe applicable, verse 3 " When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?" "If the foundations be destroyed, what can the righteous do?" My translation, when valued social norms or physical, emotional, mental things, are being or have been destroyed, what can those who are in intimate relationship with God do. Some can say what that should have been doing all along, but the truth of the matter is that we don't; always. David was anointed but not perfect, nor are we, we are being perfected as we abide. The favor of God was upon him, one can look at many instances and see this, even during the time David made the decision to dwell among the enemy. What is David feeling? He was feeling some of the same emotions that the men felt, his family was among those that were taken. Perhaps he also felt betrayed by the men, instead of empathy they provided anger towards him. Perhaps because he was the leader his all that he felt was amplified, multiplied. Perhaps do to all that he was internalizing he was partially blind to what the men felt about him, he was broken, wounded, BUT he knew the Healer, he knew who could help. Why doesn't he act immediately? I believe he doesn't act immediately because he doesn't know what do think, much less what to do. I don't know if he went through what many of us do, "why is this happening to me? Why did this happen to me? Truthfully I don't know why he didn't react immediately, however I am glad that he didn't. It could have been that he rarely ever reacted immediately to any given situation. What we do know from this passage is that he did not remain is a state of paralysis, he sought the Lord, he placed his will into the hands of the LORD, by consulting Him, before reacting to the men before him and towards those who had carried out this terrible act. David found strength, courage in the Lord instead of looking for a scapegoat, somewhere to throw blame, he turned to the Lord.

Q4. (1 Samuel 28:7-14) Why do you think God condemns occult practices of communicating with the dead and channeling spirits of the dead? Because e loves us, because He is jealous for us. Throughout His Word He warns against doing so. The Apostle Paul kinda summed it as he rebuked Elymas in Acts 13:4-13, this guy was a sorcerer nonetheless all those that deal in this area deceive in one way or another. God throughout His Word warns against consulting with any who practice the likeness of these practices. Isaiah 8:18-19 and others that were inspired by the Holy Spirit warns people to seek God and none else. The counsel of any other that is not God, or that is not inspired by God leads us away from God. The children of Israel both northern tribes and the southern tribes went into bondage because they worshipped other gods, because they adhered to those with familiar spirit, because they did not adhere to the Spirit. God condemns these evil practices and His little ones participating / partaking of them because they have the potential to lead us astray. So many passages speak of this practices as deceiving: Daniel 2:27, Ezekiel 13:8, and others. 1 Chronicles 10:13 - 14 gives us a snap shot as to why Saul died, he enquired not of Him who saves. How might such practices open Christians to victimization and oppression by evil spirits? The heart (mind) of man when not influenced by the Holy Spirit is wicked, those who practice such things are against the Lord, those who seek such things are not strengthen by the Spirit, therefore they are lead astray, some into bondage as were the children of Israel, some unto to death spiritual and possibility physical, even worse maybe the second death which is eternal. Those said to have this ability deceive, prey and manipulate which leads to victimization and oppression. What should you do if you've been involved in such practices in the past? With the help of the Holy Spirit stop, Repent, return unto the LORD of lords, KING of kings.

(1 Samuel 25) What do we learn about David's character in this incident with Nabal and Abigail? We learn that David just as any human being, there lies the chance to being lead by our emotions. Nabal words stung David, they were an insult to him. David's character (temperament) relating to Nabal was rash and hostile. We learn through the encounter between Abigail and David, even though David was blind with rage, even though his character (temperament) was hostile, that through the use of wisdom and kindness it was changed. David's character (disposition, moral fiber, spirit)was receiving, he was not so blinded that he could not hear the voice of reason. His character (personality) was not soiled by evil, David was a man after God's own heart, once he knew or was made aware that he had done wrong or was in the wrong he was inclined to seek that which was right. What do we learn about Abigail's character? She was wise, courageous, God fearing and had a discerning spirit. She was able to satisfy both David and Nabal through the use of wisdom (25:24 / 25:36). Nabal perhaps would have responded differently if Abigal had told him what she did w/o (against) his permission in a drunken state. Although David and Nabal were polar opposites, Abigail was not only wise, but she was also courageous for she did not definitively know how either man would react towards her actions. Her character also informs us perhaps she was a faithful woman, she believed in God prophesied unto David. Her prophetic truth helped David realize he would not have shed blood in a way that was within the Law, nor acceptable unto God. Nabal's character? Nabal's character according to his was wife was comparable to Belial (25:25), verse 3 tells us he was churlish (rude, impolite, ill-natured, bad-mannered) and evil. His nature in my opinion, here was disrespectful. During this time period it was proper to show hospitality, especially to your own people. Nabal's character was the opposite of his wife in several perspectives: Nabal's opinion of David influenced the facet of his character we see in verses 10-11. David known throughout Israel (1 Samuel 18:5-7). Nabal says this as a direct insult to David, his labeling David "Jesse's son," demeaned David as though he was beneath Nabal's dignity or person.. He could have formed his opinion because he himself was well off, he could have formed his opinion because David was no longer within the prestige of the royal court, he could have form this opinion as he perceived David as being rebellious, he could have formed his opinion from many sources. However what is certain is that he did not esteem David or anything David had done. Why do you think this story was included in 1 Samuel? Not sure, all things were given for an ensample unto us. We can see some things that we should do and that we should not. We should not follow the example of Nabal, his thoughts, and his actions aligned with Belial. We can gleam from the character and behavior that Abigail displayed. We can learn from David that it is good to adhere to good counsel, especially when it aligns with the Will of God. What important knowledge does it add to our understanding? God is sovereign, he uses people, if we are sensitive to His leading as he uses people that which they prophesy will align with His Word and or His character. Also if we allow ourselves to be lead by our emotions there lies a great chance our thoughts and our actions will not align with God's. Anointed people can be provoked to sin, but they do not have to. Just as God provide a way of escape from temptation, He also provides a way of escape that protects us from reverting back to our sinful nature. He talked, plead with Cain to sin not, Cain however did not adhere to His counsel, His Word. We may not always receive the reward we desire because we invested our time, gifts and talents. The recognition and gratitude may not align with what we may desire. Having said that should we expect a reward or special recognition for doing something? If the act is a benevolent acts is it benevolent if we want something in return? I believe if we desire something in return, it should be addressed prior to commencement. David assumed that he deserved whatever he asked of Nabal in return for his kindness to him. Assume can be a not so good word, we should not believe that everyone's thoughts will align with ours. There will be times when we as Christian provide a gracious act, the person we are serving my not value or appreciate what we've done, or what we may be doing. When treated unfair, unappreciated, disrespected, revile against we are not to seek vengeance, God is our Vindicator. We may deem ourselves as victim of injustice or un-appreciation. Each of us has been treated this way by someone at sometime, and we like David have wanted to seek revenge for the injustice, a pound of flesh for the way we were treated.

(1 Samuel 24:12) How do we apply the principle of not lifting a hand against the Lord's anointed in our day? The hand against the Lord's anointed in our day could be physical (self explanatory), the hand could be our actions / attitude. We can lift our hand to hurt or harm God's anointed today verbally, by being disrespectful / disobedient, non-supportative / against / constantly presenting negative confrontation. What provisions are there in 1 Timothy 5:19-20 for calling leaders to account. Basically the accusation need to be substantiated before two or three witnesses. These witnesses (the two or three) motives should be pure according to God because they have to attest to the charge against the elder (leader). "Reprimand those leaders who sin. Do it in front of everyone so that the other leaders will also be afraid." "Them that sin rebuke before all" The elder whereby it was proven to have sinned are to be brought before all, these actions are not sanctions to be carried out by way of malicious intent or for private gratification by the witnesses who substantiated the accusation, but for the purpose of accountability. This is an intervention with the hopes of stopping the furtherance of continued sin. That others also may fear - That they may be kept from committing the same offence. This is a good principle, however it is very unfortunate that it is not adhered to. The ostrich head in the sand syndrome is adhered to a greater degree. So many atrocities have accrued in many denominations because the principle set forth here was not upheld. It was said in the Middle one denomination required 72 witnesses had to substantiated any accusation against a bishop. This addition to 1 Timothy 5:19 certainly made it difficult to bring the charges, the sin before all. Charges against a elder (church leader) is not to be easily received, equally proven not many want to do it ostrich head in the sand syndrome. What do you think God will do to those who slander, persecute, and martyr his appointed leaders? It is true that what a person reap they will sow, however the sowing may not be in exactness. What is true is that God is the Vindicator, He also is the Adjudicator, He as well is merciful and just. Basically God will hold them accountable according to His Will, in His timing.

Why doesn’t David kill Saul when he has the chance? I believe that David does not kill Saul just as mentioned in the lesson, because he reverenced the Lord. " [David] said to his men, 'The LORD forbid that I should do such a thing to my master, the LORD's anointed, or lift my hand against him; for he is the anointed of the LORD." He in essence says that the Lord will be his Vindicator, " The LORD judge between me and thee, and the LORD avenge me of thee: but mine hand shall not be upon thee. As saith the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked: but mine hand shall not be upon thee." What motive do he and his men have for killing a king who is trying to kill them? The motive for David and or his men to kill Saul would seem reasonable from a worldly perspective, they were not allies, but enemies. Saul considered them enemies, I'm sure some of David's men considered Saul an enemy. An enemy killing another enemy would have been an acceptable reason according to worldly standards. What is David’s rationale for sparing Saul? David’s rationale for sparing Saul life was that he believed God's anointed Saul, God would take the appropriate action. At the appropriate time. What does this tell us about David’s character? The he honored the Lord, that he reverenced the Lord, that he honored the Lord's guidance and authority. About his faith? The he believed in the Lord, His counsel , His wisdom. David TRUSTED God! "The LORD therefore be judge, and judge between me and thee, and see, and plead my cause, and deliver me out of thine hand." What does it say about David’s leadership ability that he is able to dissuade his men from killing Saul? That he was an effective leader, and that the men respected him.

(Psalms 18, 34, 54, 56, 58, 59, 142) In these ascriptions to these psalms, how many celebrate happy occasions? Psalms 34, I love it's progression and also how it may have been birthed. Most of the psalms you have listed here do not celebrate happy occasions. Nonetheless they for me express that the writer knew whom was his Help, whom to turn to. How many arise from struggles? Most were from a place of struggle. From what we can gather from Scripture carnage is not associated with David. Instead of David withholding his feeling (imploding / exploding) and then unleashing the fury felt, he laid them down, he casted his burdens to whom was able to carry them, to whom was to vindicate rightly if vindication was required. What does this tell you about David's relationship with God? That he in fact had one, that he honored God; that he believed God was whom God said He was, and that David believed as such. What does this tell you about his faith during trials? Not only was his faith similar to Job, but that he also heavily relied on God. Though he faced trial, test and temptation one after another he sought the Lord. Although on occasion he slipped he sought the Lord. He believed that God was not only Redeemer, Sanctifier and Vindicator, but also that he was worthy of all glory, all honor, al praise. Praise that go beyond a dance or a song, praise that is lived according to His Counsel. Which is your favorite among these psalms? Of these mentioned 34, I don't know if I have a favorite, perhaps 23 Why? Perhaps because it has been one that I was introduced to early in life, perhaps because of what it says. Again I'm not sure if I could say that is my favorite, I like so many, 41, 42, 27, 63, 73, 91, etc I'm not sure for me if there is a favorite! I as well like the psalms that emphasize upon God's majesty such as Marveling at God's Majesty in Creation Psalms 8, 19, 139 and others.

(1 Samuel 23:14-18) Why does Jonathan visit David in the wilderness? Verse 16 And Jonathan, Saul's son, arose and went to David at Horesh, and encouraged him in God. It is amazing that Jonathan was able to meet with David and David with Jonathan, David was in hiding. The Scriptures does not say that God sent Jonathan, it says that Jonathan arose and went. We can infer and or believe that the Scriptures imply that that God sent Jonathan. However the Scriptures says that he "arose and went." This was a great example fidelity, love and concern between two friends to meet under such circumstances. How was this accomplished, the two had to have had some form of communication. There had to have been others who were loyal and trustworthy as well. And most importantly God had to allow it, so that it could come to pass we cannot forget that He is and was David's Comfort. because we are not Spirit, God has and will until we are changed use people, Jonathan was the instrument that God allowed to encourage David. Jonathan couldn't physically save or rescue David, nor could he provide the just right answer(s) or answer the probable why's. But what he gave was precious! He allowed God to use him. His father Saul had lost focus, he was encouraging David not to. Man can intend, attempt, and work all kinds of evil, but God is still in charge. Jonathan encouraged David in many ways, first just the fact of meeting with David, seeing a good friend is always comforting. Secondly they talked, it is always wonderful when a good friend has something edifying or positive to share. (Thus he said to him, "Do not be afraid, because the hand of Saul my father will not find you, and you will be king over Israel and I will be next to you; and Saul my father knows that also." ) Translation: God will protect you (2) you will be king and I will support you (3) my dad Saul knows all this. Translation: Sometime we hear this words and or we know these word, but like Peter we see the wind. My prayers are that we like Peter call out to Him even though! What risk is there for David? He risked being exposed, captured, killed and betraying those under his charge / care. What risk is there for Jonathan? His risk were similar to David's, his father Saul was a mad man, however add the fact that David's men perhaps may not have had the same confidence in Jonathan as did David, thereby they may have wished him harm. What do you think it meant to David? I think it meant a great deal to David and to Jonathan also. Have you ever received a visit from a friend when you needed it most? Yes

(1 Samuel 22:20-23:12) What did Abiathar and the ephod have to do with "inquiring of the Lord?" They both were ways / measures in which someone during this time would use to inquire / ask of and or confirm the Lords' Will. Abiathar escaped the wrath of Saul through hand of Doeg the Edomite. Abiathar was one of the sons of Ahimelech the son of Ahitub, he was a priest. The ephod was a part of the high priest's garments, attached was a breastplate pouch containing the Urim and the Thummim Exodus 28. The priest used the Urim and the Thummim to obtain the Will of the Lord. Abiathar escaped and fled after David; and David verse 23 asked Abiathar to "abide thou with him, fear not: for he that seeketh my life seeketh thy life: but with me thou shalt be in safeguard." Since Abiathar was a priest in the next chapter David does not made a decision in haste, he gains affirmation through Abiathar and his use of the ephod 1 Samuel 23:1-6 Why did David inquire of the Lord? He desired assurance, the Lord's Assurance. The Philistines were fighting against Keilah, and they robbing the threshing floors. David inquired of the LORD, saying, Shall I go and smite these Philistines? What huge advantage does the person have who seeks God's will before acting? The advantage is the Advocate, the Counselor is All Knowing and wise; when we hear God's voice and or understand His counsel over the noise of the world, to include self-noise, the advantage is Blessed Assurance. The wealth in His counsel is that His counsel always bring a successful resolve. That resolve may not align with our desire, yet it will be successful according to His Will. Most of us incline to do as Jacob did when he was to met his brother Esau many years after he through cunning tactics received the birthright and blessing from Isaac. Although Jacob prayed, sought the counsel of the Lord, he still formed an elaborate plan. He then wrestles with a man until the breaking of the day. This man touched the hollow of Jacob's thigh, the hollow of his thigh was out of joint. In my opinion that was God telling Jacob not your will but Mine. “Many are the plans in a man’s heart, but it is the Lord’s purpose that prevails” Proverbs 19:21. There are many things we feel we want to accomplish or see happen come to pass according to our desires (to too many to list). Whatever we want to do, if it is not in the perfect Will or the allowable Will of God, it is not wise to proceed. I don't believe that any human of our day knows the perfect Will of God in all cases; however being familiar with His Word, being led by His Spirit allows the submitted to know His Will in most cases. Unfortunately more often than not we allow our senses and or emotions dictate our behavior / actions. If we feel threatened, fear or in danger want to defend or attack. If we feel anger we want to lash out. We feel wronged and want to get revenge. if we allow our emotions to guide our behavior, if we allow our senses alone lead us we are being lead by our flesh. How can you find God's will at key points in your life? "Apply yourself to the whole text, and apply the whole text to yourself". J. A. Bengel Through normal day-day living as we seek His face, as we commune with Him we learn His voice. As read, study and meditating on His Word we can discern His Will. His word express His Will. Therefore at key points in our lives God's voice will be the voice most recognized. His influence will be our very present help.

(1 Samuel 22:2) Why were David's men attracted to him? They were attracted to David because as well were begins pursued by Saul as well. , and probably a few bandits who are wanted for various crimes. Many have a price on their head. What did they have in common? Some of the men were being unfairly harassed, perhaps unjustly persecuted as was David; some of the men either had something against Saul or Saul had something against them. Unlike David some of these men committed a crime. They all were considered a threat to Saul's reign, they all were fugitives due to one reason or another. Verse 2" And every one that was in distress, and every one that was in debt, and every one that was discontented, gathered themselves unto him; and he became a captain over them: and there were with him about four hundred men." Why kind of men were these? These men every one that was in distress - debt or discontented What difficulties do you think David probably had in leading them? Not sure at this point, later in Scripture some wanted to kill Saul whereas David did not. At this point he perhaps was concerned about their welfare, the provisions etc.., in verse 3 he makes accommodations for his probable elderly parents. 4 - 6 hundred men, some of these men had wives and children. The difficulty may have simply been affirming assurance, assurance of what next.

(1 Samuel 20:35-42) What is the nature of the covenant between David and Jonathan? The nature (type) of covenant between Jonathan and David was of friendship. The nature (intrinsic qualities) of the covenant was "Love", trust, and commitment. The nature (temperament) of the covenant was dedication / devotion towards the covenant regardless of the circumstances and or the potential results. What does David receive? David received, more than I can effectively write about. On the surface it was affirmed that he had a loyal friend, a confidant, someone to provide intelligence, a trustworthy ally. Beyond the surface he received a pledge that is built upon love, trust, and commitment. Assurance that no matter what I got you! I got your back! I got your best interest at heart! David received affirmation that the covenant extended beyond David the man, also as long as Jonathan lived he would also extend the elements of this covenant to David's family / descendents. What does Jonathan receive? Jonathan receives as does David. Who benefits the most from this covenant? That's very difficult to say, both believed the other would honor he covenant. Looking at this question from a natural point of view most would likely say David, he was not killed, while Saul lived his family was not murdered. Some may Jonathan, he has a believed confidence that his lineage will continue. Honestly I cannot say who benefited to most from this covenant of these two. I can say that all recipients (benefactors other than Jonathan's son{ Mephibosheth }) who gained knowledge of this covenant afterwards benefitted greatly. Is it self-serving -- or not? When I think of self serving I think of selfishness, not sure if that's the intent of the word here, however my answer to the question is from that perspective. My answer is NO! The results after which are the results, however the covenant was established by way of mutual love, compassion, trust, loyalty, commitment, dedication, etc.... What is the significance that God is witness to the covenant? They both recognize God as the final word. Both honored God, and acknowledged Him as witness to this covenant. As each lived, moved and had their being upon this oath God's watchful eye would be upon them. Because they honored Him, He would help either to fulfills their part of the covenant as they honored Him.

(1 Samuel 19:18-24) What does it tell us about Saul’s faith that he pursues David even when he has sought the sanctuary of the prophet Samuel? Saul, His faithe was not in line with loving God. Saul did not asscess his love for God, sometime I do not either. God tells those that serve Him to love Him in completeness (Mark 12:30). Unfortunately my (our) love is usually lukewarm. Martin Luther became so frustrated with the holiness ofGod vis-à-vis his own unholiness that he confesssed, “Love God? Sometimes I hate Him.” Many Christians would not confess in this manner, nor will they think this is possible. However when we turn from Him, His counsel, His guidance, His Word in order to do that which we are determined to do not according to His Will are we demonstrating love towards Him. Saul did not know of Mark 12:30, but he had hear or was familiar with Deuteronomy 6:5 And you shall love the LORD your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your might.

(1 Samuel 19:18-24) What does it tell us about Saul’s faith that he pursues David even when he has sought the sanctuary of the prophet Samuel? Since s sancturary is considered a sacred / holy place, Saul seeking to something according to his will and not the Will of God implies that he continues to walk in deliberate disobedience. He walking accoring to his (Saul’s) flesh. It shows that he was not honoring God,nor was it his intent when he came to the Sancturary. I cnnot say that he did not believe that God was, but I can say that the Scriptures clearly show that he did not allow God to be Lord over him. Did he believe that God was, I believe that he did. Did he adhere to God and or reverence Him, no! Sauld was blinded by his passions, His belief / faith did not demonstrate that he loved the Lord, he did not yeild and become obedient. As it was for Saul so it is for many of us at instances. Sometimes we have something before our eyes that we desire so much that our ears are not receptive to the Lords voice. We may or my not be lead by anger or hatred, nonetheless anything that we fixate beofore our eyes is just as deadly. I thank the Lord for His mercy, and His grace, I as well pray that I repent with a godly repentance when I am aware that I am not in His Will. Why do people prophesy when the Holy Spirit comes upon them? When the Holy Spirit comes upon a person, if they are under the influence of the Holy Spirit they will do as the Holy Spirit guides. God will be glorified, and His Will will be done, the measure / medium of prophecy He deems necessary He will use. Prophesying is not always speaking in an unknown tongue. Ezikiel 13:2, 34:2, Micah 2:6 etc…; nor it is always predicting something in the future nor is it always speaking a Word / giving a message under divine inspiration, it could one or the other, or it could be all three. Prophesy - To reveal by divine inspiration. To predict with certainty as if by divine inspiration. To prefigure; foreshow. v.intr. - To reveal the will or message of God. To predict the future as if by divine inspiration. To speak as a prophet. I do believe that Sameul and those in his presence where in an atmosphere of worship and devotion to God and that the Spirit of God was upon them. As the messengers came forth The Spirit of God also came upon them. These men on three occasion nor was Saul seeking to serve / worship the Lord. I believe the Lord allowed His Spirit to come upon them as a way of protecting David, changing their minds intent. They were an instrument for Saul, as the Spirit work on them they became an instrument unto God. They went back and told Saul three times what occurred, however he did not hear thus said the Lord, you will not harm David, nor will you seize him! In directly the Lord was saying turn unto Saul for you are heavy laden, I will give you rest. Place your mind upon me so that you can have peace. Saul didn't get the message, his heart / mind was like that of Pharaoh when the Hebrews' were near Exodus. Frustrated / infuriated Saul pursues David himself, he also prophesies in the presence of Samuel and the prophets. Not only does he prophesy, he also stripped off his clothes. Saul had received an indirect message from God second hand from three sets of messengers, I believe this was God’s way of giving it to he first hand, you will not harm not capture My servant David. You should reverence Me. I believe his stripping down becoming naked was symbolic saying that he would be humbled. Christ was naked upon the cross, He was not stark naked, but exposed. Saul in his own will did not humble himself before God prior to entering the sanctuary, so at this moment God through the use of His Spirit use a measure whereby Saul humbled himself. Taking off his royal attire, I believe also was symbolic that the kingdom he valued so much would not remain under his stewardship, he would not continue to captain the people. What is the relationship between this incident and the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2)? I can not say that there is,or should I say I'm not sure, what I can say in both instances the occurance and the aftermath were as Corrie Ten Boone say, "God incidences!" In both cases people were used by God, in both cases after the Holy Spirit came upon them they shared what the Lord desired them to.